That being explained possibly I utilized the incorrect load knowledge. I utilised the load information for that 124 GR. BERB HBRN TP as I used to be going by bullet fat. I did discover which the 125 GR. SIE FMJ does use an increased load.
come to the Wire for powder & loading solutions as they deficiency reference manuals - Never know how to read through a printed Relative Quickness Table and afterwards don't do comparative load lookup's in the distributor's loading info, both on the internet or their posted paper reference manuals!
If I could get my palms on some CFE I might like to test it on 9mm. CFE worked quite properly for my 45 ACP and 38 Unique loads (fired through a GP100).
I wonder For those who have located considerable variances in the best way numerous powders meter as I've? I have discovered good results with CFE-223 and Bullseye up to now but that’s it as for single powder use although not for very same grain pounds masses across several platforms.
W231 and HP-38 are a similar powder. Look at the masses to the Hodgdon web page in any caliber that lists both of these powders and you'll see they're precisely the same.
So, have any of You furthermore may at any time utilised this load? I certain hope it really works out, they appear to have lots of it.
W231 (or vice versa if you wish to evaluate it this way). Hodgdon and Winchester both purchase the powder in the similar OEM producer, the only real change could be the canister wherein It can be bought.
So .... speedier burning powder indicates slower muzzle velocity and slower burning powder implies more rapidly velocities, leaving medium burn up price powders for medium velocities from the 800~1000 fps variety. I'm a "textual content reserve" reloader ... usually utilizing the ideal burn off fee for a certain load. By selecting the proper burn price, it is possible to sustain decrease chamber pressures however realize increased velocities, which also extends the lifetime of any gun.
It is hard to believe that it's been 47 years because Hodgdon HP-38 was introduced to the market given that the potential successor to Hercules (now Alliant) Bullseye because the predominate powder for concentrate on and light-weight-obligation handgun loads.
Many thanks with the opinions. Fantastic info. HP38 powde I'm sort of old skool and been reloading for years. Sort of caught in my means and not usually prepared to attempt the newest stuff considering that most often, I live by "if it ain't broke, Never fixit".
I also shoot IDPA revolver. That Activity examined 19 diverse manufacturing unit cartridges before selecting a PF of a hundred and five. Prior boundaries of one hundred twenty five ended up nicely into +P ranges. Quick powders for example Bullseye and Clays have been excellent at that degree and they are conventional Manufacturing unit level hundreds.
I understand for your proven fact that Ramshot Enforcer and Correct 4100 are similar powders - distinctive labels. I've confirmed this by my own load advancement as well as a chronograph.
I hp-38 powder don't Imagine your trouble is connected with using HP38/231 but fairly the hardness in the commercially produced bullets.
HP-38 has no deterrent coating and subsequently, it is extremely straightforward to initiate ignition so typical pistol primers are all of that is necessary.